# Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved - Page 8 - Politalk.ca

Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »



Status of the Petition: While the referendum is not outright cancelled, the judicial decision pauses the certification of signatures until the matter is reviewed (0:04-0:24). The creator emphasizes that individuals can still collect signatures, noting the irony that proponents previously claimed to have enough signatures already (0:53-1:02).
Critique of Proponents: The creator expresses strong criticism of Keith Wilson (referred to as "Black Hat Guy"), questioning his legal interpretations and referencing past professional controversies and lawsuits involving him and First Nations groups (1:02-1:29; 2:06-2:19).
Constitutional and Treaty Concerns: The creator argues that treaty rights are not negotiable and that any constitutional amendment—such as secession—would require a national constitutional conference (1:31-1:40). They also point out that clauses within the Canadian Constitution (specifically articles 25 and 35) prevent the use of the notwithstanding clause for the purpose of secession (3:07-3:14).
Political Context: The creator criticizes Premier Danielle Smith (referred to as "Danny"), suggesting she has placed herself in a difficult political position by aligning with separatist groups while facing legal realities that prevent their goals from coming to fruition (3:34-3:41; 4:31-5:00).
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
al_keda
Posts: 1405
Joined: Tue May 14, 2024 7:20 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by al_keda »

User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »

David Parker's Involvement: The project was launched by David Parker, who claimed in a Globe and Mail interview that he "licensed" the data from a vendor. The leader of the Republican Party of Alberta, Cam Davies, stated his organization had provided the list to various vendors for authorized use and is now investigating potential misuse (5:07-6:06).

Potential Consequences:
Under the Election Act of Alberta, the unauthorized use of voter information for purposes other than authorized election activities is a serious offense, punishable by fines of up to $100,000, imprisonment for up to one year, or both

Shame execution isn't an option.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
al_keda
Posts: 1405
Joined: Tue May 14, 2024 7:20 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by al_keda »

What pisses me off is that if Marlaina had control of the Sheriffs, then there might be no or only a surface investigation into it.

Political parties do not have the right to private voters lists, no matter what the UCP believes.
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »




This was never going to pass and now it's fucked. The grift was always the intent but now the parade they thought they were leading has now turned into pitchfork and torch wielding raging mob with bloodlust on their minds. Hope that works out for them. Popcorn anyone?
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »


“These breaches of the personal privacy of millions of Canadian citizens are deeply concerning. I expect Elections Alberta and the RCMP to work thoroughly and expeditiously to assess the causes and to pursue appropriate actions against those responsible.

“We must be constantly vigilant to protect the rights of Canadians and the integrity of our democratic processes.”
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »



Inauthentic Operations: A report from the Media Ecosystem Observatory identified at least 20 coordinated YouTube channels that use repetitive scripts, misleading titles, and fabricated statistics to exploit political tensions for engagement (1:13-1:56).
The 'Faceless' Business Model: The operation relies on a strategy known as 'faceless' YouTube channels. Creators based in the Netherlands—specifically individuals identified as Don Jüers, Marion Masseuse, and Yup Liquor—hire actors from around the world to present the content (2:53-4:57, 6:39-7:35).
Hired Talent: Actors, such as Matt Barry from Calgary and a voice actor from Indiana, were contracted to record scripts they didn't necessarily believe in, often without signing formal agreements, to give the channels a veneer of local authority (2:24-4:43, 5:44-6:05).
Profit-Driven Misinformation: The individuals behind this network, some of whom learned the business through courses like Faceless Education hosted by Niels Vanderland, openly admit that their primary motivation is generating ad revenue rather than advancing any real political movement or ideology (5:07-5:29, 6:53-7:21).
Ultimately, the investigation highlights the danger of such "faceless" content, where creators with no personal stake in the issues they discuss can effectively weaponize real societal grievances to drive millions of views for financial gain (7:42-8:21).
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »


https://www.youtube.com/live/0YZwP-RHLT ... PoGu8UxoZN

Alberta’s NDP Caucus has obtained video evidence that appears to show that a senior member of the United Conservative Party (UCP) party executive and a member of the UCP Caucus staff, people that are in the Premier’s inner circle, attended the April 16 online meeting of the Centurion Project. This meeting provided training to volunteers on how to use the separatists’ project database that is at the centre of this data breach of three million Albertans’ electoral data.

The Alberta NDP Caucus obtained a recording of the Centurion Project’s April 16 online meeting, attended by 80 individuals. The attendee list and a video recording of the call identify that a ‘Rob Smith’ and an ‘Arundeep Sandhu’ were in attendance. The President of the UCP is named Rob Smith and the UCP Caucus Director of Stakeholder Relations is named Arundeep Sandhu.

Alberta’s New Democrats have passed this recording on to the RCMP as they continue their investigation.

This obtained video also shows Centurion Project members demonstrating how to use a database to search for personal information of Albertans by searching for the name and address of former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney. Jason Kenney’s personal information was shared on screen with all meeting attendees. This video appears to show the database that was built using the unauthorized electors list that was the subject of an injunction issued by the Court of King’s Bench on April 30, 2026.

Premier Smith must immediately confirm whether Rob Smith and Arundeep Sandhu identified in the video are the same individuals that are associated with the UCP party and caucus. If these were the same UCP associates, the Premier must also explain:

-Why were senior UCP officials attending the meeting? Were they directed to attend?

-How she can claim, as recent as yesterday, that she only learned of this data breach from police statements on April 29-30, published almost two weeks after this meeting took place?

-Why was it not reported or disclosed by any UCP or any government official to the RCMP and Elections Alberta that the Centurion Project appears to have unauthorized access to the electors list?

-What actions, if any, she has taken to protect the privacy of Albertans?

Albertans deserve answers and transparency from Premier Smith and this UCP government, now.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
Post Reply