Politalk.ca

Historical Context: In 1985, the U.S. icebreaker Polar Sea transited the Northwest Passage without Canadian permission, highlighting the weakness of Canada's legal enforcement at the time (0:00-0:32).
The Sovereignty Debate: Canada maintains that the Northwest Passage consists of historic internal waters (2:30-2:45). However, the U.S. and other nations often view them as international waters (1:43-2:12).
The Players:
Russia: Focuses on militarizing its own northern coast to protect the Northern Sea Route and does not challenge Canadian Arctic claims (5:11-6:37).
China: Positions itself as a "near-Arctic state" and uses research vessels to gain data, remaining strategically ambiguous rather than openly aggressive (8:26-9:43).
United States: Despite being a key security partner via NORAD, the U.S. maintains a long-standing policy of not recognizing Canadian sovereignty over the passage (10:07-11:21).
Canada's New Strategy: To secure its claim, Canada is investing $40 billion into the North, focusing on "presence" through new forward operating locations, radar systems, and the Grace Bay all-season road (13:51-14:57).
Ultimately, the video concludes that Canada is moving from empty promises to building physical infrastructure to establish presence, betting that this will eventually lead to international recognition of its Arctic sovereignty (18:44-18:58).

Gistraction at it's finest.
99% of the threat to the Arctic will come from US oil tankersw wishing to transit from Alaska to Europe.
Satellites, hydrophones, missiles and drones mean warships aren't safe if we don't say so.
Look at what Iran can do.

I read somewhere that by some treaty that ended the 1812 routing of the US that they have to remove the propellers from their warships and be towed to transit our waters? I have never heard of this outside of a couple random mentions.