# What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About - Politalk.ca

What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »




Donald Trump has announced the largest military aid package to Taiwan in history

The United States will sell Taiwan weapons worth $11 billion.

This is already the second tranche this year: the first, approved in November, amounted to $330 million. The decision still requires approval by Congress.

The package includes:

▪️ 82 HIMARS systems
▪️ 420 ATACMS missiles, 756 M31A2 MLRS rocket pods, and 447 M30A2 rocket pods
▪️ 60 M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzers with ammunition
▪️ ALTIUS drones
▪️ 1,050 Javelin anti-tank missiles and 1,545 TOW missiles
▪️ Tactical Mission Network software worth over $1 billion for command, control, and communications.

Taiwan thanked the United States, saying the deal will help the island “rapidly build strong deterrence capabilities.”

China’s Foreign Ministry urged the US to “adhere to the One China principle” and immediately stop what it called dangerous actions to arm Taiwan.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
al_keda
Posts: 1288
Joined: Tue May 14, 2024 7:20 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by al_keda »

In every simulation, the US loses to China 97% of the time.

Sure the US has some impressive hardware. But China went with cheap and numerous. The Gerald R Ford can stop 5 drone based attacks. But can it defend from 100? 1000? That's the direction China went.. Fire 100 'Sea Baby' type drones at an Arley Burke, see if it survives. If it does, send 500 more.

The US will lose, unless China is completely incompetent.
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »


NYT: In 2023, CIA warned Apple, Nvidia, and AMD of possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan by 2027

According to the report, U.S. intelligence privately alerted major tech companies that Beijing could move against Taiwan within the next few years.

Around 97% of advanced chips are currently produced on the island. A blockade or destruction of its facilities could trigger a global economic crisis.

The warning was tied to U.S. national security concerns and aimed at pushing companies to diversify production away from Taiwan.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »


Chinese President Xi Jinping met Taiwan opposition leader Cheng Li-wun in Beijing:

“The leaders of the two parties are meeting today to safeguard the peace and tranquility of our shared home.

To promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.

We are willing, based on the common political foundation of adhering to the 1992 Consensus and opposing Taiwan independence...

To seek peace for both sides of the strait, to seek well-being for our compatriots, and to seek rejuvenation for the nation.

To firmly hold the future of cross-strait relations in the hands of the Chinese people themselves.”
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12743
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: What the China-Taiwan Conflict is REALLY About

Post by Dr Strangelove »


JUST IN: While every camera in the world is pointed at the Serena Hotel in Islamabad today, Xi Jinping shook hands with KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. The first high-level KMT-CCP leadership meeting in nearly a decade. Xi told her: “Compatriots on both sides of the strait are all Chinese, one family.” He added: “Taiwan independence is the chief culprit undermining peace.” Cheng called her six-day trip a “journey for peace” and invoked the 1992 Consensus.

This did not happen by accident. It happened today.

The Iran war pulled American military assets out of the Pacific. Carriers, Marines, THAAD, Patriots, all redeployed to the Middle East since February 28. Brookings explicitly identified this as “strategic space” for Beijing. China then used its leverage over Iran (1.5 million barrels per day, Tehran’s largest customer) to nudge Tehran toward the ceasefire. Trump confirmed: “I heard yes” when asked if China persuaded Iran. The ceasefire was the entrance fee for the May 14-15 Beijing summit. Today’s KMT meeting is the pre-summit positioning play.

The sequence is architectural. China vetoed the UN Hormuz resolution on April 7 (preserving Iran’s leverage and its own intermediary status). China nudged Iran toward the bilateral ceasefire the same day (building goodwill with Trump). China scheduled the Xi-Cheng meeting for April 10 (the day Islamabad talks begin, when US attention is maximally diverted). And the May summit sits five weeks away, where Taiwan language will be tested in a room where China arrives with three diplomatic receipts: we helped you get the ceasefire, we kept the KMT dialogue alive, and we are the only power that can deliver Iran.

Meanwhile, the KMT-controlled legislature has stalled Taiwan’s $40 billion special defense budget for asymmetric capabilities. The same party whose chairwoman is shaking Xi’s hand today is the party blocking the weapons purchases Washington needs Taiwan to make to sustain the First Island Chain deterrence strategy that underpins US containment of China. Bloomberg reported that Beijing will “use the sitdown to argue that Taiwanese people are in favor of closer ties, sending a key signal to the US.” The New York Times said Xi is using the meeting “to cast Beijing as a peacemaker and squeeze the island’s president.”

Taiwan produces over 90 percent of the world’s most advanced semiconductors. TSMC commands 72 percent of the global foundry market. A full conflict over Taiwan would erase $10.6 trillion in global GDP in year one. This is not a sideshow. This is the main event wearing a mask.

Trump is a transactional president. He has already shown willingness to use allies as leverage (NATO “freeloaders,” Greenland, Panama Canal). China is betting that a president who just watched his NATO allies refuse to join the Iran war, who needs rare-earth supply chains for AI and defense, who wants a trade deal before midterms, will be receptive to a framing in which Taiwan is “handled” through dialogue rather than deterrence.

The Islamabad talks are about Iran. The Beijing handshake is about everything else. And the country that brokered the ceasefire, blocked the UN vote, moved its tankers freely through a closed strait, and met the opposition leader of America’s most strategically vital partner all did it in the same week.

The real negotiation is not at the Serena Hotel. It is already underway at the Great Hall of the People.

open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
Post Reply