# IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION - Page 87 - Politalk.ca

IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »


BREAKING NEWS: The New York Times just published Iran’s 10-point proposal that ended the war.

Here’s what Iran demanded:

End all attacks. Full sanctions relief. Stop Israeli strikes including on Hezbollah. Reconstruction support. Secure shipping through Hormuz. Guarantees America will never attack again.

In return — Iran reopens the Strait of Hormuz.

With a $2 million per ship fee.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »


- The Iranian regime remains in place
- The enriched uranium remains in place
- Iran remains in control of the Strait of Hormuz, though it agrees to let ships through, for now
- The US agrees to talks based on Iran’s terms, including an end to all sanctions and Iran gets to charge $2 million a ship for passage through the Strait, in perpetuity.
- Meanwhile NATO is in ruins, the US and Israel are at odds, the Gulf States know they cannot depend on the US to protect them, etc etc etc

“Another such victory and we are undone!”

So let me get this straight…
•$40 billion spent
•300+ Americans wounded
•Over a dozen killed
•Oil prices doubled
•U.S. bases severely damaged

And what do we get?

Iran keeps its uranium.
No nuclear deal.
The Strait of Hormuz still unstable.
And the world sees us as weaker, not stronger.

Sounds about right for a Trump deal.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »


BREAKING: The NYT just reported that Iran accepted the ceasefire following a last-minute intervention by China asking Tehran to show some flexibility. Every headline framed this as Beijing playing peacemaker. Read it again through the lens of what China actually gets from the pause, and a different architecture emerges.

Before this ceasefire, 1.22 million barrels per day of Iranian crude were flowing to Chinese teapot refineries in Shandong province via 26 ghost fleet tankers operating with transponders dark, settling in yuan through CIPS, which hit 928 billion renminbi in daily volume by March 9th. Those teapot refineries, roughly 250 independent plants processing 25 percent of China’s total refining capacity, were buying Iranian crude at a discount that had flipped to a premium during the war but still arrived cheaper than spot Brent because the ghost fleet avoids Western insurance, Western brokers, and Western currency.

The ceasefire does not disrupt any of that. It preserves it.

Hormuz reopens for two weeks under Iranian military coordination. The ghost fleet continues to operate. The yuan toll infrastructure remains in place. The CIPS settlement architecture is not dismantled. The 206 million barrels of Iranian crude already stockpiled in Shandong onshore tanks are not returned. The teapot refineries that processed 80 to 90 percent of Iran’s wartime exports continue running at 54 percent utilization with no change in their supply chain.

What the ceasefire removes is the risk that President Trump’s Power Plant Day would escalate the war to a level where Iranian crude exports ceased entirely, Chinese ghost fleet tankers were interdicted, or the conflict spilled into a regional conflagration that disrupted Chinese trade routes across the Indian Ocean. China intervened not to save Iran. China intervened to save the infrastructure it spent two decades building inside the crisis.

Trump understood this dynamic. His ceasefire announcement credited Pakistani mediation explicitly, naming Prime Minister Sharif and Field Marshal Munir, while saying nothing about Beijing’s role. The omission is strategic. Acknowledging Chinese pressure would position Beijing as a co-equal broker in a war that America prosecuted and America is now settling. By crediting Pakistan, Trump preserves the frame that the United States drove the outcome while using a trusted intermediary, and keeps China’s role invisible to the domestic audience that would interpret it as weakness.

The molecule thesis clarifies what the ceasefire changes and what it does not. The ceasefire reopens the strait. It does not rebuild the crackers. The ceasefire eases oil prices. It does not restore petrochemical production. The ceasefire pauses the bombing. It does not reverse the 85 percent destruction of Iran’s weapons-chemistry capacity that the IDF confirmed. And the ceasefire does not touch the parallel infrastructure that China built during the war: the ghost fleet logistics, the yuan toll framework, the CIPS settlement volumes, or the teapot refinery supply chains that now operate as a permanent non-dollar energy corridor between the Persian Gulf and Shandong.

The war destroyed Iran’s petrochemical capacity. The ceasefire preserved China’s shadow energy architecture. The first outcome was the American objective. The second outcome was the Chinese objective. Both were achieved simultaneously, and the two-week pause is the mechanism that locks both in place while Islamabad negotiates the terms of what comes next.

Phase 2 begins Friday. The molecules begin whenever the last reactor is rebuilt. The ghost fleet sails tonight.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
al_keda
Posts: 1282
Joined: Tue May 14, 2024 7:20 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by al_keda »

Completely unnessecary , as all the orange guy got was the same deal he cancelled, plus user fees for the straight, and a new generation of anti-american youth.
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »

He got his cut from inside trading, it is the taxpayer that will be footing the bill for this mess. Meanwhile US dollar as the reserve currency is all but toast but he won't be alive long enough for him to feel the pain from that.

In other word this is his standard MO since he started. How does shitler make a million dollars? 1st start off by getting a billion from your daddy/Russians and then run the casino/tv show/country into the ground and use it as a tax write off. Art of the deal!
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 12660
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: IRANIAN CITIES BURN AMID REBELLION

Post by Dr Strangelove »


JUST IN: Iran’s new supreme leader apparently approved the ceasefire from a hospital bed in Qom where US-Israeli intelligence says he is unconscious and unable to participate in any decision-making. Few hours later, IRGC cluster warheads were still detonating over Israeli and gulf cities. Not many in the Western press have connected these two facts, and the connection rewrites everything the market just priced.

The system that accepted the ceasefire and the system that violated it are not the same system. That is the point of Mosaic Defence.

Twenty years ago, the IRGC restructured itself into 31 independent provincial commands, each with its own missile arsenal, drone fleet, Basij militia integration, and pre-delegated launch authority. The doctrine was designed for exactly this scenario: supreme leader incapacitated, central communications degraded, conventional military infrastructure destroyed. Every provincial commander can execute offensive operations without a phone call to Tehran. The architecture was tested in war games, refined after watching Saddam’s centralised command collapse in 48 hours in 2003, and activated the moment Ali Khamenei was killed on February 28th.

The senior IRGC military council that approved the ceasefire through the Supreme National Security Council, citing Mojtaba’s name for domestic legitimacy, does not control the launch decisions of every provincial unit. It cannot. That is by design. The field commanders who fired at Israel and the UAE after the announcement were not violating orders. They were following standing pre-delegated authority that exists precisely so that operations continue when the centre cannot communicate, or chooses not to. The ceasefire was a political act by the council in Tehran. The missile launches were a military act by autonomous field units in the provinces. Both happened simultaneously because the architecture permits it.

This is what the market failed to price when WTI crashed nine percent.

The nine percent drop assumed a unified Iranian state that accepted a ceasefire and would enforce it across all domains. What exists instead is a fragmented command structure where political leadership in Tehran can sign agreements that provincial military commanders are neither required nor expected to follow in real time. The Mosaic Defence that kept the regime alive through 39 days of the most intense bombing campaign since 2003 is the same architecture that makes ceasefire enforcement structurally unreliable.

Israel understood this immediately. The IDF did not pause. It continued eliminating Hezbollah fighters in southern Lebanon, struck a weapons crossing south of the Litani River, and cited Iranian violations as justification for ongoing raids on Iranian targets. Netanyahu’s calculus is transparent: if the adversary’s own military architecture cannot enforce a ceasefire, then the ceasefire does not constrain the defender.

The molecule thesis absorbs this development without modification. If the ceasefire holds, the crackers are still rubble and reconstruction takes years. If the ceasefire fragments because autonomous IRGC units continue launching, the war resumes and the deficit deepens. Both branches produce the same terminal condition for petrochemical supply. The human-chain game theory from yesterday and the Mosaic Defence autonomy from tonight converge on the same conclusion: the crisis duration is structurally guaranteed by the adversary’s own defensive architecture, regardless of what any council signs in Tehran or any diplomat negotiates in Islamabad.

The supreme leader is unconscious. The missiles are not.

open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
Post Reply