# Danielle Smith's Ridiculous Fight Against Canada - Page 10 - Politalk.ca

Danielle Smith's Ridiculous Fight Against Canada

Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13925
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Danielle Smith's Ridiculous Fight Against Canada

Post by Dr Strangelove »

Clarke Ries: How two Alberta judges shot separatist delusions to death
(And, not for nothing, they probably just wrecked Quebec separatism, too.)
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
al_keda
Posts: 1411
Joined: Tue May 14, 2024 7:20 pm

Re: Danielle Smith's Ridiculous Fight Against Canada

Post by al_keda »

Smith has already floated using the NWS clause to bypass the court.

Except the NWSclause doesn't override First Nations treaties. Bitch.
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13925
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Danielle Smith's Ridiculous Fight Against Canada

Post by Dr Strangelove »


UCP put the duty to consult in a CIA just months ago.

“The irony of all this is that the Court found that the government planted the seeds of its own legal defeat when it amended the Citizens Initiative Act late last year to allow for the chief electoral officer to green-light a previous separation petition that had initially failed to meet the legal requirements of the Act. The judgment: "Following the CEO Decision, the Amended CIA put in motion a series of required steps that engaged the duty to consult with the Applicants. No consultation occurred. Alberta breached its duty to consult with the Applicants."
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13925
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Danielle Smith's Ridiculous Fight Against Canada

Post by Dr Strangelove »


The Constitutional Dispute: Danielle Smith argues that the 'duty to consult' should primarily be viewed through the lens of major industrial projects and questions its applicability to citizen-initiated petitions (0:31-2:00). The video narrator disputes this, asserting that constitutional treaty rights and the duty to consult have a much broader scope.
Wab Kinew's Intervention: Wab Kinew challenges Smith's position, clarifying that the government, not petition organizers, bears the responsibility to fulfill the duty to consult, especially when rights like hunting and fishing are impacted (3:27-4:06).
Political Analysis: The narrator criticizes Danielle Smith's approach to Indigenous relations and her stance on a potential separation referendum, arguing that her policies create uncertainty and hinder investment in Alberta (8:30-12:12).
Calls for Unity: Wab Kinew advocates for national unity, suggesting that Canada should focus on working together and building infrastructure rather than engaging in divisive referendum discussions (5:39-6:33, 12:55-13:29).
Coming up later in the video:

The video further explores the narrator's critique of conservative political strategies in Canada and includes a summary interview where Wab Kinew reflects on the brief, strained interaction he had with Smith following the press conference (12:13-14:23).

WTG Wab!
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
Post Reply