Page 1 of 1

Bill S-210

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 2:50 pm
by Dr Strangelove

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 2:51 pm
by Dr Strangelove

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 4:43 pm
by Dr Strangelove


COMPLIANCE HAS RISK. A database with this much personal information is a prime target and without robust and constant scrutiny will fail.

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2025 3:36 pm
by al_keda
Dr Strangelove wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 2:50 pm A single point of entry sounds good but when the info gets hacked and it is mandatory to register isn't this the gun registry all over again?
I didn't submit to the gun registry, and I won't to this either.

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 1:41 am
by Dr Strangelove
Didn’t Take Long To Reveal The UK’s Online Safety Act Is Exactly The Privacy-Crushing Failure Everyone Warned About
The only websites with the financial capacity to work around the government’s new regulations are the ones causing the problems in the first place.

It makes it harder for adults to access perfectly legal (and often helpful) information and services. It forces people to create detailed trails of their online activity linked to their real identities. It drives users toward less secure platforms and services. It destroys small online communities that can’t afford compliance costs. And it teaches an entire generation that bypassing government surveillance is a basic life skill.
Working as intended

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 3:25 pm
by al_keda
Bypassing government surveillance is required in a free society.

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2025 11:22 am
by Dr Strangelove


Peter has issues with freedom.

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2026 1:32 am
by Dr Strangelove

Canada's New Social Media Ban is NOT About Your Children | Here's What They're NOT Telling You

Canada just announced the Digital Safety Act — a social media ban for anyone under 16.

Most Canadians think this is about protecting children. It isn't.

To enforce a social media ban, every single Canadian will have to prove their age by attaching government-approved ID to their social media accounts. That's not child protection. That's a digital ID.

And once you're verified on one platform, that verification follows you everywhere — linking every account you own under your real identity.

But it gets worse.

This isn't a standalone policy. This is the missing piece that connects Bill C-9, C-22 and C-8 into a complete surveillance and censorship system.

Bill C-9 defines what you can and cannot say online. Bill C-22 forces platforms to save your data for up to one year. Bill C-8 gives the government the power to cut you off the internet entirely.

The digital ID created by this social media ban is what connects all three.

And they're selling it to you as child protection.

Don't be fooled. All these bills are interconnected — and this is the last piece of the puzzle.

youtube.com/live/tiwBDgstT…

Re: Bill S-210

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2026 8:34 am
by Dr Strangelove