# Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved - Page 8 - Politalk.ca

Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13247
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13247
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »



Status of the Petition: While the referendum is not outright cancelled, the judicial decision pauses the certification of signatures until the matter is reviewed (0:04-0:24). The creator emphasizes that individuals can still collect signatures, noting the irony that proponents previously claimed to have enough signatures already (0:53-1:02).
Critique of Proponents: The creator expresses strong criticism of Keith Wilson (referred to as "Black Hat Guy"), questioning his legal interpretations and referencing past professional controversies and lawsuits involving him and First Nations groups (1:02-1:29; 2:06-2:19).
Constitutional and Treaty Concerns: The creator argues that treaty rights are not negotiable and that any constitutional amendment—such as secession—would require a national constitutional conference (1:31-1:40). They also point out that clauses within the Canadian Constitution (specifically articles 25 and 35) prevent the use of the notwithstanding clause for the purpose of secession (3:07-3:14).
Political Context: The creator criticizes Premier Danielle Smith (referred to as "Danny"), suggesting she has placed herself in a difficult political position by aligning with separatist groups while facing legal realities that prevent their goals from coming to fruition (3:34-3:41; 4:31-5:00).
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13247
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »

It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
al_keda
Posts: 1341
Joined: Tue May 14, 2024 7:20 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by al_keda »

User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13247
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by Dr Strangelove »

David Parker's Involvement: The project was launched by David Parker, who claimed in a Globe and Mail interview that he "licensed" the data from a vendor. The leader of the Republican Party of Alberta, Cam Davies, stated his organization had provided the list to various vendors for authorized use and is now investigating potential misuse (5:07-6:06).

Potential Consequences:
Under the Election Act of Alberta, the unauthorized use of voter information for purposes other than authorized election activities is a serious offense, punishable by fines of up to $100,000, imprisonment for up to one year, or both

Shame execution isn't an option.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
al_keda
Posts: 1341
Joined: Tue May 14, 2024 7:20 pm

Re: Proposed Alberta separation referendum question approved

Post by al_keda »

What pisses me off is that if Marlaina had control of the Sheriffs, then there might be no or only a surface investigation into it.

Political parties do not have the right to private voters lists, no matter what the UCP believes.
Post Reply