# Pierre Poilievre Is Lying To Your Face - Page 47 - Politalk.ca

Pierre Poilievre Is Lying To Your Face

Post Reply
User avatar
testerone
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2024 3:42 pm

Re: Pierre Poilievre Is Lying To Your Face

Post by testerone »

Dammit! Beat me to the punch posting the 'Insult' video.
The bugger just keeps copying the Trump policy of lie lie lie. What next? Tear down 24 Sussex for a ballroom?
Every PM in Cdn history has wanted a ballroom, and I will finally build one!
User avatar
testerone
Posts: 748
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2024 3:42 pm

Re: Pierre Poilievre Is Lying To Your Face

Post by testerone »

Shame that reality falls on so many deaf ears. And closed minds.
I've seen obscure allegations like his 2nd cousin's brother in law owns shares in RBI so when he bought his staff double-doubles that proves he's corrupt.
Seems like PP insists on going full Trumpalo and doubling down on the lies and misinformation
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13283
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Pierre Poilievre Is Lying To Your Face

Post by Dr Strangelove »



Sponsored by Post Media
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
User avatar
Dr Strangelove
Posts: 13283
Joined: Wed May 08, 2024 4:50 pm

Re: Pierre Poilievre Is Lying To Your Face

Post by Dr Strangelove »


Sorry ,Pierre, but I was there during the Harper years in Ottawa, and you were not part of the inner circle of power. You had little incidence on what Harper and his close team decided. You were, however, always in search of the media spotlight and you were asking journalists-myself included- to be quoted in their report.

You spoke French very well and I, working for French TV (TVA Nouvelles), was always happy to find bilingual politicians. I would have used a clip of you in my reports but what you said always stopped me. Even then, you were all about personal attacks and superficial comments. You never discussed /analyzed THE POLICY, always the party.
Ad Hominem rather than Ad Rem.
And those politicians ( from all parties ) I tended to exclude in favour of those who examined the substance.

" No fighting with the other party " in my reports was my motto. Explaining factually why you are against x or y decision, yes. But otherwise, it's just empty political attacks and the citizens of Canada deserve better.
You haven't changed, Pierre, despite the responsibilities that are now upon your shoulders.
It can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. - Sagan
Cynicism is acceptance
Post Reply